How to Overcome Encryption Challenges with Cloud HSMs

Written by David Close, Chief Solutions Architect | Dec 12, 2023 6:00:00 AM

Rehashed Blog - Encryption Challenges & Cloud HSM Trends.docx

Top Encryption Challenges and Cloud Trends to Watch in 2025 & Beyond

Overview:

Encryption is at the center of enterprise risk as AI-driven breaches surge and regulations tighten. This post pinpoints four pressure points - deployment hurdles, ballooning TCO, scaling limits, and overlapping compliance rules - that quietly erode security. It then shows how cloud HSMs, OpEx pricing, and automated key-lifecycle platforms remove hardware friction and unlock elastic control. The result is a clear roadmap for strengthening data protection while slashing cost and complexity.

AI-driven cyberattacks are now easier to launch and harder to detect. In 2024, more than half of organizations reported suffering a significant breach, with the global average data breach cost nearing $5 million. These pressures have made encryption a critical last line of defense for sensitive data.

However, many organizations encounter unexpected encryption challenges when deploying and scaling secure solutions.

Managing massive amounts of encrypted data often causes data encryption issues, from application latency to inconsistent backup coverage.

Key management complexity and other common encryption pitfalls can leave data vulnerable if incorrectly handled. For example, failing to rotate or revoke keys on schedule is a frequent mistake that undermines security. Any oversight can become a serious enterprise encryption risk.

However, data encryption is easier said than done. Here are four key challenges that organizations face when implementing encryption solutions.

Challenge 1: Deployment Complexities in Enterprise Encryption

Even before choosing algorithms, teams must tackle deployment hurdles. Deploying an on-premises HSM means shipping a tamper-resistant hardware unit to a secure data center, racking it, plugging in power/network cables, and installing software.

These hardware encryption deployment challenges include securing rack space, arranging maintenance contracts, and keeping firmware and drivers in sync with each server's OS.

Security experts warn that encryption solutions must be compatible with existing infrastructure or risk breaking legacy systems.

Hardware logistics: Installing an HSM requires a secure, climate-controlled rack with power and network connectivity.

Compatibility: Admins must update the HSM's firmware and drivers to match the host servers' OS and hypervisors. Integrating encryption on older systems often causes failures.

Customization: Each application (databases, web servers, cloud connectors) typically needs custom integration with the HSM's APIs or client libraries.

Cloud setup: Cloud HSMs remove the physical steps, but you still configure virtual networks, identity/policy settings, and key imports in each cloud environment.

Physical security & compliance: You must define and enforce who can access on-premises HSM consoles. Many regulations require dual-control or audit logging for hardware devices.

In short, the initial deployment phase is complete with moving parts. These hardware-centric complexities can delay projects and increase misconfiguration risk. Even cloud-based encryption must contend with network and configuration issues.

Addressing these deployment challenges head-on is vital, as they represent some of the most persistent encryption challenges enterprises face today.

Challenge 2: Total Cost of Ownership for HSM Solutions

Among the most common encryption challenges is cost. Encryption's strongest tools can be expensive.

Traditional on-premises HSMs carry a hefty price tag, and that's just the hardware cost.

The total cost of ownership (TCO) includes many other factors: data center space and power, specialized support contracts, and personnel. Companies often cite underestimating these expenses as a costly oversight.

Hardware purchase: Industry HSM appliances require a substantial upfront investment. A high-availability setup may require multiple units, quickly multiplying the capital outlay.

Maintenance & support: Ongoing expenses include annual support contracts, firmware update fees, and spare parts or warranties.

Infrastructure & staffing: Rack space, power/cooling, and a trained team to run and audit the HSMs add ongoing costs.

Compliance & audits: Certifications like FIPS 140-2 and PCI DSS require consultants and person-hours for testing and documentation.

Hidden factors: Failing to budget for these combined expenses is a standard encryption pitfall that can derail projects.

Cloud subscription: Moving to a cloud HSM shifts spending to subscription (OpEx). This avoids upfront CapEx but introduces recurring fees. Pay-as-you-go pricing means costs can rise with usage.

In practice, calculating TCO requires careful planning. Many teams find that support contracts and staff costs exceed the initial hardware spend over several years.

Cloud HSM services alter the equation: you avoid large purchases but must monitor and optimize ongoing usage costs. Failing to account for these expenses can limit your encryption strategy's ROI.

Challenge 3: How Scalable Is Your Encryption Infrastructure?

Protecting more data and new workloads puts pressure on encryption platforms. A key issue is key management complexity, which tends to escalate as the number of systems increases. In real terms, scaling an encryption deployment involves many hurdles:

Throughput limits: Each HSM device can handle only a certain number of encryption operations per second. Scaling often means deploying additional units or instances, requiring setup and capacity planning.

Clustering & HA: Organizations often cluster HSMs or distribute them across sites for high availability. Setting up and synchronizing multiple HSMs adds complexity to networking and management.

Key proliferation: More applications and services mean more keys. This key sprawl raises the risk of lost or forgotten keys and makes rotation schedules harder to enforce, which is a common enterprise encryption risk.

Global expansion: Encryption across multiple regions or clouds often requires replicating keys or imposing region-specific key policies, which adds latency and administrative overhead.

Future workloads: Emerging needs like IoT devices, big data analytics, or microservices can dramatically increase encryption demands. The solution must absorb sudden spikes without bottlenecks.

Unfortunately, many traditional encryption solutions don't auto-scale seamlessly. If your HSM cluster reaches its limits, you may face downtime or delays while adding capacity.

Anticipating these needs early, for example, by architecting cloud HSMs or elastic key management into your strategy, helps mitigate future encryption challenges before they impact operations.

Challenge 4: Navigating Global Encryption Compliance (HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS)

Encryption plays a central role in meeting today's complex regulations, but each law has its own requirements.

For example, GDPR and HIPAA explicitly require organizations to protect personal or health data with strong encryption. Industry standards like PCI DSS impose additional rules for payment data.

Juggling all these can be one of the most formidable compliance difficulties in encryption:

GDPR (EU): Requires protecting personal data by design and default, typically through encryption. It also grants individuals the right to be forgotten, meaning you must be able to delete or render encrypted data unreadable upon request.

HIPAA (US): Treats encryption as an "addressable" safeguard for protected health information (PHI). In practice, covered entities usually encrypt PHI to reduce breach risk, but they must document how encryption keys are handled and access is controlled.

PCI DSS: It mandates end-to-end encryption of cardholder data using approved algorithms (e.g., AES-256, RSA). It also requires strict key rotation schedules and split-key procedures to minimize single points of failure.

FIPS/FedRAMP: U.S. federal systems often demand validated HSMs (FIPS 140-2 Level 3 or 4) and rigorous key management practices. Service providers may need specific certifications (e.g., FedRAMP) to host encrypted data.

Other laws: Countries like China, India, or regions like California (CPRA) have their own rules for data encryption and residency. For instance, some laws require that keys or encrypted data stay in-country, complicating multi-region deployments.

These overlapping requirements create compliance difficulties in encryption. For example, maintaining detailed key usage logs can conflict with data retention limits.

Proving to auditors that every key was rotated or every access was legitimate demands comprehensive automation. In short, encryption must not only be applied, but also documented and monitored.

Having tackled the four core encryption challenges, it's clear that staying ahead of emerging encryption challenges requires flexible, scalable solutions.

The following three trends show how organizations address those pain points with new models and services.

Trend 1: Cloud HSMs Simplify Key Management

Cloud-based HSMs are rapidly becoming mainstream as businesses move to the cloud. By outsourcing HSM hardware, companies can dramatically simplify the challenges above.

For example, Cloud HSM services allow organizations to rent a secure, high-assurance cryptographic vault from a provider, handling encryption and key storage without any physical hardware on-premises. In practice, this means:

No hardware to manage: The cloud provider installs, secures, and updates the HSM appliances, so your team can focus on other security tasks.

Integrated key lifecycle: Cloud HSMs often integrate with managed KMS platforms to automate key generation, rotation, and retirement across accounts and regions.

On-demand scaling: You can provision additional HSM capacity instantly via API or console, supporting more keys or higher throughput without waiting for hardware delivery.

Multi-cloud & hybrid support: Leading services work across multiple cloud providers and on-premises (for hybrid architectures), providing a unified interface for managing keys.

Built-in compliance: Many cloud HSM offerings have already been validated for FIPS 140-2 Level 3, PCI DSS, and other standards, simplifying the certification path.

Many cloud platforms offer built-in key management, which is easy to use but relies on software-based protections.

Futurex VirtuCrypt delivers hardware-level security in the cloud.

These services provide customers with a dedicated, tamper-resistant module that meets compliance standards while maintaining the cloud's agility.

Trend 2: Why OPEX Models Are Replacing CAPEX in Encryption

Another major trend is the shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) to operational expenditure (OpEx) models for encryption. Instead of buying hardware upfront, many organizations now subscribe to encryption services.

The advantages are compelling: there's no large up-front payment, and deploying encryption services can happen immediately through a portal or API. Monthly or usage-based billing also makes costs more predictable. For example, AWS, Azure, and Google all let you spin up HSM or KMS instances on-demand and charge by the hour or key-count.

Key points of this OpEx model include:

Subscription pricing: On-demand HSM and key management instances are billed per hour or capacity. You pay only for what you use, avoiding the sticker shock of large purchases.

Predictable budgets: Finance teams prefer the steady operational expense. Subscriptions can be scaled up or down as needed.

Faster deployment: No waiting on procurement; you can run an HSM cluster in minutes.

Flexibility: Organizations can pilot encryption services without long-term commitment, then adjust or cancel as projects change.

Of course, this model brings new considerations. Pay-as-you-go costs can climb if usage isn't monitored, so teams must track their consumption.

Still, the move to OpEx makes encryption tools accessible to smaller teams and aligns costs with actual needs. Companies that once needed huge budgets to justify HSMs can now start small and grow their encryption footprint organically.

Trend 3: Cloud-Based Key Lifecycle Management Explained

As encryption solutions scale, specialized cloud key management services are gaining traction. These platforms centralize and automate the entire key lifecycle across your environment.

Industry guides highlight benefits like automated key rotation, lifecycle management, and integration with multiple clouds. In practice, a cloud KMS provides:

Centralized orchestration: Manage all keys from a single dashboard, with policies that apply across applications, cloud accounts, or regions.

Automated rotation: Keys are created, rotated, and automatically retired on defined schedules, eliminating manual errors and forgotten expirations.

Multi-cloud support: The service can link keys to resources in AWS, Azure, GCP, or on-premises systems, giving you visibility over all encrypted data.

Audit logging: Logs record every key operation (generation, use, rotation, deletion), making compliance reporting straightforward.

Policy enforcement: You define access rules for each key (for example, which users or services can use and when), and the KMS ensures these rules are enforced.

A robust key management platform should seamlessly handle rotation schedules, expiry alerts, versioning, and policy enforcement. By adopting cloud-based key management, organizations offload tedious tasks and significantly reduce mistakes.

In essence, this trend further reduces key management complexity by turning manual chores into automated workflows, providing the oversight needed to keep encryption reliable and compliant.

The table below summarizes the key differences between on-premises and cloud HSM solutions:

Feature	On-Premises HSMs	Cloud HSM
Deployment & Management	It requires purchasing physical HSM devices and dedicating IT staff to installation and upkeep.	No hardware to buy or install; the provider manages the HSM appliances on your behalf.
Scalability	Limited by installed hardware, scaling up means buying and configuring additional units.	Instantly scalable on demand; you can add HSM capacity via API or console.
Availability & Redundancy	Achieving HA requires manual deployment of backup HSMs and failover mechanisms.	Leverages the provider’s built-in high-availability infrastructure and geographic redundancy.
Security Model	You have complete control over devices, keys, and physical security.	Shared responsibility: The provider secures the hardware/environment, and you control the keys and access policies.
Cost Structure	High upfront CapEx (hardware purchases) plus recurring power, space, maintenance, and staff costs.	Pay-as-you-go OpEx (subscription or usage fees); no hardware purchase required.
Compliance	You must validate devices and internally manage certifications (FIPS, PCI, etc.).	HSM service is usually FIPS 140-2 Level 3 and PCI DSS certified, easing compliance efforts.

Both approaches have trade-offs in control, cost, and complexity. On-premises HSMs give you maximum control but require heavy investment, while cloud HSMs offer agility at the cost of relying on a third-party service.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does post-quantum cryptography affect current encryption strategies?

Quantum computers pose a future threat to algorithms like RSA and ECC, which quantum algorithms (Shor's) could break. As a result, organizations are planning migration to quantum-resistant algorithms.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has released a list of quantum-safe public-key algorithms for encryption and digital signatures.

In practice, enterprises are beginning to use hybrid approaches, such as encrypting data with a classical and a post-quantum algorithm.

Today, most data remain protected with current standards, but systems (and HSMs) are being upgraded to support NIST's post-quantum algorithms in preparation for the arrival of large quantum machines.

What role does encryption play in zero trust security models?

Encryption is foundational to zero trust. Zero trust assumes attackers may already be inside networks, so protecting data is critical. Encryption ensures that the information remains unreadable without the keys, even if data flows or devices are compromised.

In a zero-trust architecture, all data, whether in transit or at rest, is typically encrypted.

Encryption ensures that even if data is intercepted, it cannot be read without the correct decryption key. This supports the zero-trust model by securing every communication and storage layer by design.

Can cloud service providers access encrypted data if they manage the encryption keys?

It depends on who holds the keys. If you use a provider-managed key (for example, using the cloud vendor's key management service), technically, the provider could decrypt your data or be compelled by authorities to do so.

By contrast, the provider cannot decrypt the content if you manage your keys (e.g., through client-side encryption or a "bring-your-own-key" model).

In other words, if the provider has the keys, they can provide decrypted data under legal demand; if you alone hold the keys, the provider only sees ciphertext.

How do organizations audit and monitor the effectiveness of their encryption infrastructure?

Strong audit and monitoring are essential. Organizations typically enable detailed logging on HSMs and key management services, then feed those logs into security systems (SIEMs). This records every key creation, access, rotation, and usage. In practice, teams set up alerts for unusual key activity (like out-of-hours access), regularly review logs, and perform periodic audits to ensure keys have been rotated and used correctly.

External audits or penetration tests often include attempts to misuse keys or bypass encryption, ensuring the system's controls work.

What is the difference between symmetric and asymmetric encryption, and when should each be used?

Symmetric encryption uses a single secret key (shared by sender and receiver) for encryption and decryption. It is swift and efficient for large volumes of data, so it's ideal for encrypting disks, databases, backups, and bulk communications (e.g., AES for file encryption or TLS data transfer).

Asymmetric encryption uses a key pair (public key for encryption, private key for decryption). It allows secure key exchange and digital signatures without sharing a secret.

As a result, it's used for smaller data sizes, key exchange, and authentication (e.g., RSA or ECC for TLS handshakes and digital certificates).

Most systems use a hybrid approach: They use asymmetric algorithms to securely agree on a symmetric session key and symmetric encryption for the actual data.

Next Steps: Strengthening Your Enterprise Encryption Strategy

Encryption remains a cornerstone of data protection in 2025 and beyond but carries significant hurdles. As outlined above, teams must overcome complex deployments, hidden costs, scaling demands, and a tangled web of regulations, all representing the digital era's encryption challenges.

The good news is that cloud HMS solutions are emerging to address many of these issues.

Cloud HSMs eliminate much of the hardware hassle, OpEx models make budgeting easier, and integrated cloud key management automates tedious tasks. By understanding these challenges and adopting the right trends, organizations can modernize their encryption strategy to protect data more effectively and stay compliant.

Ready to modernize your enterprise encryption strategy? Download our expert guide: Mastering Cloud-Based Key Management eBook.

View full post